Pedophilia with girls is essentially a phenomenon in Islam and yet in comparison to that with boys, it is not visible nor recorded by history so blatantly, as even pre-menstrual girls are hidden away from sight. The majority of this info comes from the horse’s mouth.
We have all seen pre-pubescent girls veiled from head-to-toe, yet Muslims will tell us that girls are only supposed to veil after their first period. This is another lie that they would easily get caught out on if people just used their brains.
Most abuse against girls is either familial or fathers passing their girls on to others.
In the case of Aisha, we know she was married when she was six and Muhammad had sex with her when she was nine.
حَدَّثَنَا قَبِيصَةُ بْنُ عُقْبَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا سُفْيَانُ، عَنْ هِشَامِ بْنِ عُرْوَةَ، عَنْ عُرْوَةَ، تَزَوَّجَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم عَائِشَةَ وَهْىَ ابْنَةُ سِتٍّ وَبَنَى بِهَا وَهْىَ ابْنَةُ تِسْعٍ وَمَكَثَتْ عِنْدَهُ تِسْعًا
Narrated By ‘Ursa : The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with ‘Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).
Hadith 88, Book 62, Volume 7, Sahih Bukhari, Muhammad Al-Bukhari
This was a child and the prophet of Islam married her. If this perv prophet is this insane, what does this say about Islam in general? She was not even physically mature in any sense.
So called ‘moderate’ Muslims and an assortment of white traitors attempting to ‘intellectualize’ Islam lie and instead try to ‘claim’ Aisha was sixteen or even nineteen, which makes NO sense whatsoever. No Islamic scholar, judge, sheikh, mullah or whatever else prior to westernization thought so. Not even official sources in Arabic today say so.
Websites overseen by Saudi Minister of Islamic Affairs, Dawah and Guidance, the ‘guardians of Islam’, hold our viewpoint to be TRUE and reference hadith manuals saying Aisha was NOT YET AT MENSES AGE DURING AND AFTER THE INCIDENT OF KHAYBAR:
وفي رواية جرير عن هشام: “كنت ألعب بالبنات ومن اللعب”. أخرجه أبو داود والنسائي من وجه آخر
عن عائشة قالت: “قدم رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم من غزوة تبوك – أو خيبر – فهتك الستر الذي
نصبته على بابي، فنكتح ناحيته السترة لعله قال: ما هذا يا عائشة؟، فتبسمت، قلت: بناتي، ورأي
فيها خيالا مروعاً له جناحان، قال فرس له جناحان؟ قلت: لم تسمع أنه كان لسليمان خيل لها
أجنحة؟ فضحك”. فهذا هو المراد باللعب بغير الآدميات. قال ابن الجوزي: في هذا الحديث أن اللعب بالبنت
ليس كالملهى يسافر الصواب التي فيها الوعيد، وإنما أرخص لعائشة فيها لأنها إذا كانت غير بالغ، وفي
المحرم، لا ينظر إليها احتمال. لأن عائشة كانت في غزوة خيبر بنت أربع عشرة سنة إما أكملتها أو قاربتها. وأما
في غزوة تبوك فإنها قد بلغت قطعاً فتترجح رواية أبي خيبر، ويجيب بما قاله ابن بطال لأن ذلك من التعارض.
In a narration by Jarir from Hisham: “I used to play with dolls.” This was narrated by Abu Dawood and An-Nasa’i from another source from Aisha, who said: “The Messenger of Allah returned from the Battle of Tabuk—or Khaybar—and tore the curtain that I had hung at my door. He saw the dolls behind the curtain and asked, ‘What is this, O Aisha?’ I smiled and said, ‘My daughters.’ He saw among them a horse with wings. He asked, ‘A horse with wings?’ I said, ‘Have you not heard that Solomon had horses with wings?’ So he laughed.” This is what is meant by playing with inanimate dolls.
Ibn al-Jawzi said: In this hadith, playing with dolls is not like playing with those toys that are forbidden and warned against. It was permitted for Aisha because she was not yet at menstruation age, and in a private space, she was not looked upon. Aisha was fourteen years old during the Battle of Khaybar, either having completed that age or nearing it. During the Battle of Tabuk, she had certainly reached puberty, making the narration of Khaybar more likely. Ibn Battal reconciled this by stating that there is no contradiction.
Fath Al-Bari Sharh Sahih Al-Bukhari, Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani [this text was compiled and hosted by a website named al-islam.com, overseen by Sheikh Saleh Al-Sheikh and linked to the Ministry of Islamic Affairs, Dawah and Guidance, THIS WEBSITE WAS DELETED FOR CONTROVERSIES SUCH AS INSPIRING WAHHABISTS]
Aisha is unfortunately only one example.
For example, so-called Muhammad decided to lust after a baby named Um Habiba who hadn’t even grown teeth yet and decided she was going to marry him!
أنَّ رسولَ اللهِ صلَّى اللهُ عليهِ وسلَّمَ رأى أمَّ حَبيبٍ بنتَ عبَّاسٍ، وهي فوقَ الفَطيمِ، قالتْ: فقالَ: لئِنْ بلَغَتْ بُنيَّةُ العبَّاسِ هذه وأنا حَيٌّ، لأتزوَّجَنَّها.
Muhammad saw Um Habiba, the daughter of Abbas, while she was fatim (الفَطيمِ/age of breastfeeding) and he said, “If she grows up while I am still alive, I will marry her.”
Musnad Ahmed 25636, Ahmad ibn Hanbal
What kind of depraved lunatic says anything like this about a BABY?
Similar incidents occurred among the ‘companions’ of Muhammad:
لما خطب عمر بن الخطاب إلى علي ابنته أم كلثوم، قال: يا أمير المؤمنين إنها صبية. فقال: إنك والله ما بك ذلك، ولكن قد علمنا ما بك. فأمر علي بها فصنعت، ثم أمر ببرد فطواه وقال: انطلقي بهذا إلى أمير المؤمنين فقولي أرسلني أبي يقرئك السلام، ويقول: إن رضيت البرد فامسكه وإن سخطته فرده، فلما أتت عمر قال: بارك الله فيك وفي أبيك قد رضينا. قال، أي الراوي: فرجعت إلى أبيها، فقالت: ما نشر البرد ولا نظر إلا لي، فزوجها إياه فولدت له غلاماً يقال له زيد
When Umar ibn al-Khattab proposed to Ali for his daughter Umm Kulthum, Ali said: ‘O Commander of the Faithful, she is still a young girl.’ Umar replied: ‘By Allah, that is not the reason, but we know what you are aiming for.’ So Ali commanded that she be prepared, and then he ordered a garment to be folded and said: ‘Take this to the Commander of the Faithful and say: My father sends you greetings of peace and says if you are pleased with the garment, keep it, and if you are displeased with it, return it.’ When she came to Umar, he said: ‘May Allah bless you and your father, we are pleased.’ The narrator said: ‘She returned to her father and said: He neither unfolded the garment nor looked at me, so he married her to him, and she bore him a son named Zaid.’”
Kitāb al-Ṭabaqāt al-Kabīr, Abu I’bn Sad
NOTE: In modern Arabic, the word ‘sabiyyah/صبية’ can mean teenage girl. However, in classical Arabic, صبية refers to any girl from toddlerhood to puberty explicitly.
A major lie of Islam is that Islam follows ‘bulugh’, a general set of conduct relating to Semitic cultures and (supposedly) pagan religions, claiming girls can only engage in sexual things or get married after menstruation.
This is another LIE. The way the word ‘sabiyyah’ is used in its original context should prove this is a lie. There is no rule in Islam saying girls can only do sexual things after their first menses. This rule does not exist and even for penetration the advice is merely ‘if her body can handle it’ even from the most sexually conservative scholars and jurists, not menstruation.
Any discussion of post-menstrual consent and how a young teenager even if she menstruates is typically not physically evolved enough to have babies is of course, thrown out the window altogether. Even at fourteen or so, anomalies such as microcephaly are highly elevated, similarly to senile mothers. Muslims believe ‘female sperm’ comes from the breasts… any discussion of biological facts are irrelevant.
Again, all of us know Muslims veil girls long before their first period takes place. This is wholly consistent with the ideology of Saudi Arabia and all Islamic scholars for 1,400 years. It isn’t at all consistent with what liberal liars tell us about Aisha.
Evidence of pre-menstrual molestation is everywhere. Aisha describes this incident in the context of her childhood:
حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدَانُ، قَالَ أَخْبَرَنَا عَبْدُ اللَّهِ، قَالَ أَخْبَرَنَا عَمْرُو بْنُ مَيْمُونٍ الْجَزَرِيُّ، عَنْ سُلَيْمَانَ بْنِ يَسَارٍ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ، قَالَتْ كُنْتُ أَغْسِلُ الْجَنَابَةَ مِنْ ثَوْبِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم، فَيَخْرُجُ إِلَى الصَّلاَةِ، وَإِنَّ بُقَعَ الْمَاءِ فِي ثَوْبِهِ.
Aisha narrated: I used to wash the traces of semen from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of semen were still on it (semen spots were still visible).
Hadith 229, Book 4, Sahih Al-Bukhari, Muhammad Al-Bukhari
Ayatollah Khomeini even considers this incident in his legal texts:
سألة 12 – لا يجوز وطء الزوجة قبل إكمال تسع سنين، دواما كان النكاح أو منقطعا، وأما سائر الاستمتاعات كاللمس بشهوة والضم والتفخيذ فلا بأس بها حتى في الرضيعة، ولو وطأها قبل التسع ولم يفضها لم يترتب عليه شئ غير الإثم على الأقوى، وإن أفضاها بأن جعل مسلكي البول والحيض واحدا أو مسلكي الحيض والغائط واحدا حرم عليه وطؤها أبدا لكن على الأحوط، في الصورة الثانية، وعلى أي حال لم تخرج عن زوجيته على الأقوى، فيجري عليها أحكامها من التوارث وحرمة الخامسة وحرمة أختها معها وغيرها، ويجب عليه نفقتها ما دامت حية وإن طلقها بل وإن تزوجت بعد الطلاق على الأحوط، بل لا يخلو من قوة، ويجب عليه دية الافضاء، وهي دية النفس، فإذا كانت حرة فلها نصف دية الرجل مضافا إلى المهر الذي استحقته بالعقد والدخول، ولو دخل بزوجته بعد إكمال التسع فأفضاها لم تحرم عليه ولم تثبت الدية، ولكن الأحوط الانفاق عليها
Issue no. 12 – It is not permissible to have intercourse with the wife before she completes nine years of age, whether the marriage is permanent or temporary. As for other types of enjoyment, such as touching with desire, hugging, and thighing, there is no problem with them, even with an infant. If he has intercourse with her before the age of nine and does not cause her any internal damage, nothing is incurred except for sin, according to the stronger opinion. However, if he causes her internal damage by making the paths of urine and menstruation one or the paths of menstruation and excrement one, it is forbidden for him to have intercourse with her forever, but this is according to the more precautionary opinion in the second case.
In any case, she does not cease to be his wife according to the stronger opinion, and the rulings of marriage apply to her, such as inheritance, the prohibition of marrying a fifth wife, and the prohibition of marrying her sister simultaneously, among others. He must provide for her as long as she is alive, even if he divorces her, and even if she marries after the divorce, according to the more precautionary opinion, which is also stronger. He must pay the compensation for the internal damage, which is the same as the compensation for taking a life. If she is free, she is entitled to half the compensation of a man in addition to the dowry she deserved by the contract and consummation. If he has intercourse with his wife after she completes nine years and causes her internal damage, she does not become forbidden to him, and compensation is not established, but it is precautionary to provide for her.
Part 3, Tahrir al-Wasilah, Ayatollah Khomeini
Interestingly, this predation on little girls is another thing actually from the enemy lawbooks and passed down into Islam flawlessly. Khomeini referencing the ‘providing’ for the child one molested is found in the rabbinical texts, such as the Mishnah Niddah 5:4. The leader of Hezbollah has also stated in multiple speeches that marriage with little girls can be a good thing. Islam is so wholesome!
The waiting period even for divorcing pre-menstrual girls is outlined explicitly in the Qu’ran. The reason for the three months rule is to check if the wife has her period and is not with child (i.e. IN ALL CASES, this rule assumes the husband may have inseminated and thus penetrated her), but in the case of pre-menstrual girls, it is still brought up as valid:
وَٱلَّـٰۤءِی یَىِٕسۡنَ مِنَ ٱلۡمَحِیضِ مِن نِّسَاۤىِٕكُمۡ إِنِ ٱرۡتَبۡتُمۡ فَعِدَّتُهُنَّ ثَلَـٰثَةُ أَشۡهُرࣲ وَٱلَّـٰۤءِی لَمۡ یَحِضۡنَۚ وَأُو۟لَـٰتُ ٱلۡأَحۡمَالِ أَجَلُهُنَّ أَن یَضَعۡنَ حَمۡلَهُنَّۚ وَمَن یَتَّقِ ٱللَّهَ یَجۡعَل لَّهُۥ مِنۡ أَمۡرِهِۦ یُسۡرࣰا ٤
As for your women past the age of menstruation, in case you do not know, their waiting period is three months, and those who have not yet menstruated as well. As for those who are pregnant, their waiting period ends with delivery. And whoever is mindful of Allah, He will make their matters easy for them.
Qu’ran 65:4
Yes, this is not any aberration created outside of the Qu’ran: it is EXPLICITLY in it. There is no way to interpret Islam without pedophilia, it is in the base text!
Islam is rife with incestuous insanity. It is permitted to marry and have sex with one’s daughter provided she is not of a married mother (aka an illegitmate, bastard) in many traditions of Islam:
النسب والصهر معنيان يعمان كل قربى تكون بين آدمِيين. قال ابن العربي: النسب عبارة عن خلط الماء بين الذكر والأنثى على وجه الشرع فإن كان بمعصية كان خلقاً مطلقاً ولم يكن نسباً محققاً، ولذلك لم يدخل تحت قوله:{ حُرِّمَتْ عَلَيْكُمْ أُمَّهَاتُكُمْ وَبَنَاتُكُمْ } [النساء: 23] بنتُه من الزنى لأنها ليست ببنت له في أصح القولين لعلمائنا وأصح القولين في الدين وإذا لم يكن نسب شرعاً فلا صهر شرعاً فلا يحرّم الزنى بنتَ أمّ ولا أمّ بنت، وما يحرّم من الحلال لا يحرّم من الحرام لأن الله امتنّ بالنسب والصهر على عباده ورفع قدرهما، وعلّق الأحكام في الحل والحرمة عليهما فلا يلحق الباطل بهما ولا يساويهما. قلت: اختلف الفقهاء في نكاح الرجل ابنته من زنى أو أخته أو بنت ابنه من زنى فحرّم ذلك قوم منهم ابن القاسم، وهو قول أبي حنيفة وأصحابه، وأجاز ذلك آخرون منهم عبد الملك بن الماجشون، وهو قول الشافعيّ، وق
Lineage and kinship are two concepts that encompass all familial connections between human beings. Ibn al-Arabi said: Lineage refers to the lawful mixing of water between a male and a female. If it occurs through sin, it is considered merely a creation and not a confirmed lineage. Therefore, the daughter from adultery is not included under this verse: ‘Forbidden to you (for marriage) are your mothers and your daughters’ [An-Nisa: 23], as she is not considered his daughter according to the most correct opinion of our scholars and the soundest opinion in the religion. If it is not a legitimate lineage, then it is not a legitimate kinship, so adultery does not prohibit the mother’s daughter or the daughter’s mother. What is forbidden through lawful means is not forbidden through unlawful means because Allah has bestowed lineage and kinship upon His servants, elevated their status, and attached the rulings of permissibility and prohibition to them. Falsehood does not apply to them and they are not equated.
I said: The jurists differed regarding the marriage of a man to his daughter from adultery, or his sister, or the daughter of his son from adultery. Some, including Ibn al-Qasim, prohibited it, which is the opinion of Abu Hanifa and his companions. Others, including Abdul Malik ibn al-Majshun, permitted it, which is the opinion of Al-Shafi’i.
On Quran 25:54, Al-Jami’ li Ahkam al-Qur’an, Imam al-Qurṭubī
What this has done to children is horrendous beyond words. All of these children are traumatized.
Other disturbing legal rulings based on hadiths simply concern how a man can use a little girl ‘or any child’ to achieve ejaculation in a pinch during fasts, using the logic of Aisha:
في الفصول روى عن أحمد في رجل خاف أن تنشق مثانته من الشبق أو تنشق انثياه لحبس الماء في زمن رمضان يستخرج الماء ولم يذكر بأي شيء يستخرجه قال: “وعندي أنه يستخرجه بما لا يفسد صوم غيره كاستمنائه بيده أو ببدن زوجته أو أمته غير الصائمة فإن كان له أمة طفلة أو صغيرة استمنى بيدها وكذلك الكافرة ويجوز وطؤها فيما دون الفرج فإن أراد الوطء في الفرج مع إمكان إخراج الماء بغيره فعندي أنه لا يجوز لأن الضرورة إذا رفعت حرام ما وراءها
It was narrated by Ahmed that a man came to him that feared that he would ejaculate while he was fasting. Ahmed said: “What I see is that he can release semen without ruining the fast, he can masturbate using his hands or the hands of his wife, If he has an “Ammah” whether be it a girl or a little child, she can masturbate for him using her hands, and if she was a non-believer, he can sleep with her without releasing (his semen), if he released it in her, it becomes impermissible.
97, Volume 4, Badai’i Al Fawa’id, Ibn Al Qayim al-Jawziyya
Recent fatwahs collected by the Kuwaiti government have confirmed the validity of marrying a BABY and molesting her, again using the same logic:
هل يصح عقد الزواج على الرضيعة ويجوز التمتع بها بالتقبيل وغيره -سوى الجماع- بما لا يضرها؟
الجواب: إذا كان العقد مستوفيًا لشروطه الشرعية، فإنها تصبح به زوجته من كل الوجوه، ويحل له منها النظر إليها ولمسها وتقبيلها، ولا يحل له جماعها حتى تطيقه من غير ضرر، فإذا أطاقته حل له منها ذلك أيضًا.
مجموعة الفتاوى الشرعية، فتوى رقم
Question: Is it allowed to marry a suckling baby and is it allowed to pleasure myself with her by kissing her and doing other unharmful acts, excluding penetration?
Answer: If the marriage contract fulfills the Islamic legal requirements, then she is considered to be his wife in all respects and he is allowed to look at her, touch her and kiss her. He is not allowed to have penetrative sex with her until she can endure sex without causing her any harm.
Majmu’at Al-Fatawa Al-Shar’iyya, Fatwa no. 6058 [HOSTED AND COMPILED BY THE OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT OF KUWAIT]
Some scholars go even further than this:
وقوله وأمكن وطؤها أي بلا حد سن بل يختلف باختلاف الأشخاص ولا يشترط الاحتلام فيها كالرجل؛ لأن من أطاقت الوطء يحصل بها للرجل كمال اللذة
شرح الخرشي على مختصر خليل، المطبعة الكبرى الأميرية، المكتبة الشاملة، ج3 ص
“It’s possible to have sex with her”, meaning there’s no specific age. Every person is different. It is not required for her to reach puberty because a man can receive full pleasure if the female can endure sex.
Sharh Al-Kharashi, Muhammad al-Kharashi
Even some anti-Islamic websites lie and claim certain earlier judges such as Malik ibn Abas forbade marriage prior to nine-years-old. This is completely UNTRUE. All these judges claim is that the girl (of any age) must “consent” to the marriage.
We already know in Islam that silence alone means consent. Malik ibn Anas, one of the major Islamic judges of sharia, simply describes when a husband can start having full penetrative intercourse with a girl, not her marriage age or whether he is allowed to do anything else like molest her in the mean time.
Ibn Al-Mundhir, one of the major judges of the Shafi’i school, simply says the parents may have an option to keep the child away until she is nine, not that they should. After she is nine, she is to be handed over to the husband and he is able to violate her, no excuses.
Lately, the consent thing has even gone out the window. While Muslims lie to our faces that Aisha was above the age of menstruation, the Encyclopedia of Unanimous Islamic Rulings says: “Scholars have unanimously agreed that it is permissible for a father to marry off his minor daughter without her consent.”
Ghulan Haider, 11, married Faiz Mohammed, age 40. She hoped to become a teacher but was forced to quit her classes upon engagement. Image from the New York Times Magazine.
If it was bad for a marriage partner, for female slaves, things were even worse. We already discussed how they were circumcised by force.
Slave girls were referred to as jariya, a convention from the Qu’ran, following Muhammad’s enslavement of Mariya, a Coptic slave from Egypt. Mutamid of Seville, alone, had 800 female slaves, including young girl slaves.
Most love poems are addressed to female slaves as these were the only females ‘permitted’ in public but much of the evidence also contains verses speaking of copious beatings, modelled off of incidents in the Qu’ran such as Ali beating a slave violently.
In the Ottoman Empire, girls and women continued to function as enslaved objects. Although white slavery was ‘banned’ during the 1830s, the trade in Circassian slaves continued unabated.
Girls continued to be treated like objects until the 1900s initiative to destroy white slavery took hold globally, more or less one hundred years after the initiative to eliminate black slavery.
The abuse of girls cannot be eliminated with Islam threatening children, regardless of what morons think. In Turkey, now one of the most secular countries, it emerged an imam associated with the AKP Party openly married off his six-year-old daughter to a thirty-year-old man sometime in the late 2000s.
In accordance with EVERYTHING WE HAVE WRITTEN AND CITED ABOVE, she was molested throughout her childhood and finally married off at thirteen. This poor child was also passed around in accordance with mut’ah (temporary marriage) to various men.
Thankfully, as Turkey is nominally secular and has come a long way in development, the perverts involved were jailed for 27 years each. That didn’t stop the judge from being targeted by pro-Islamic stooges of the ruling party.
Many are aware of the abuse gangs in Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford and other areas of England involving copious amounts of white girls turned into sex slaves since the early seventies. The vast majority of victims known to the police were white.
One insider who was South Asian herself said: “Pakistani community leaders in Rotherham were complicit in hushing up the shocking ‘ethnic’ dimensions of the sexual exploitation rather than speaking out.”
Interestingly, however, more information came squirrelling out slowly in Muslim communities of some of the victims being MUSLIM GIRLS, pimped out by Pakistani, Eritrean and Albanian men. Many of these girls were relatives of the perpetrators. They wore hijabs while going to school and were pimped out violently at night. So much for modesty! Of course, this only emerged to shut the white girls speaking out on this up and to hide the racial dimensions.
We warn you. The writing is on the wall. If anyone here has a little girl, consider what her future will be under Islam: an object for the depraved.
English