The Islamic State, often called by the blasphemous name of “ISIS” or misleading name of”Daesh” (a false name implying its illegitimacy within Islam), waged a campaign of extreme terror from the early 2010s up to the present day with the collapse of the Syrian and Iraqi state authority in Sunni areas of the Levant.
TERROR INFLICTED ON YEZIDIS
The Islamic State captured Mosul in June 2014. It advanced to Sinjar, the home of most Yezidi people, two months later. IS conducted raids on Yezidi villages which were temporarily protected by peshmerga or Kurdish armies. In the village of Kocho, Yezidis made up most of the population. Arab commanders came to the village to demand that the Yezidis abandon all their weapons and IS would leave them be. Note the typical element of deception here.
It appears some Arabs had attempted to protect the Yezidis, as this fell through and the representatives of the Islamic State came to Kocho and gave a command: convert to Islam or die.
The men and adolescent males were rounded up at a local high school and killed en masse.
On the ground floor, the IS commander reportedly berated the Yazidi men and older boys for their reluctance to convert to Islam, charging that they were intent on continuing
to live in the pre-Islamic period or jahiliyyah. IS fighters ordered them to surrender their gold, money, mobile telephones, and other valuables.[…]
Since IS was ousted from Kocho in May 2017, at least eleven mass graves holding the remains of men and adolescent boys have been discovered inside the village’s perimeter.
A demographic documentation of ISIS’s attack on the Yazidi village of Kocho
حَدَّثَنَا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ، حَدَّثَنَا يَزِيدُ بْنُ هَارُونَ، أَخْبَرَنَا مُسْتَلِمُ بْنُ سَعِيدِ ابْنُ أُخْتِ، مَنْصُورِ بْنِ زَاذَانَ عَنْ مَنْصُورٍ، – يَعْنِي ابْنَ زَاذَانَ – عَنْ مُعَاوِيَةَ بْنِ قُرَّةَ، عَنْ مَعْقِلِ بْنِ يَسَارٍ، قَالَ جَاءَ رَجُلٌ إِلَى النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَقَالَ إِنِّي أَصَبْتُ امْرَأَةً ذَاتَ حَسَبٍ وَجَمَالٍ وَإِنَّهَا لاَ تَلِدُ أَفَأَتَزَوَّجُهَا قَالَ ” لاَ ” . ثُمَّ أَتَاهُ الثَّانِيَةَ فَنَهَاهُ ثُمَّ أَتَاهُ الثَّالِثَةَ فَقَالَ ” تَزَوَّجُوا الْوَدُودَ الْوَلُودَ فَإِنِّي مُكَاثِرٌ بِكُمُ الأُمَمَ ” .
Narrated Ma’qil ibn Yasar: A man came to the Prophet (ﷺ) and said: I have found a woman of rank and beauty, but she does not give birth to children. Should I marry her? He said: No. He came again to him, but he prohibited him. He came to him third time, and he said: Marry women who are loving and very prolific, for I shall outnumber the peoples by you.
Hadith 2024, Sunan Abu Dawud, Abu Dawud as-Sijistani
Enslaved child-bearing age women and girls around and past menstrual age were carted off to holding facilities in Mosul which appear to have been warehouses. This parallels the grooming gang situation in England, where girls were also copiously carted off to warehouses after being plied with alcohol and beatings, serving as slaves (prostitutes) to service hundreds of Muslim men.
Upon being in these facilities, these girls were given ultimatums to convert to Islam or die. Most did not. Failure to do so involved being spat on, punched, hit with rifle butts, beaten violently or even being lit on fire.
As they refused to convert, they were relegated to the position of being sex slaves. Frequently they were exchanged between the military commanders, emirs and other titled individuals of the Islamic State, while the footsoldiers were typically deprived access to these sex slaves unless they displayed valor in battle.
Customers came to the Islamic State looking for suitable slaves. As in Islam’s general history, slaves of defect or illness were not considered appropriate objects to buy.
One woman was exchanged between a Libyan and Syrian continuously, held by a group of men, then sold to an Azerbaijani. Some customers, such as the Iraqi commander, never touched the women sexually but simply beat them black and blue. Then they were sold to the battalion of ‘the Beast’ and the Emir among them, where some of the most vicious soldiers took them for pleasure.
All the ‘owners’ were financially compensated for allowing sexual access to their slaves, making them more or less the modern definition of pimps as much as they were slave owners. As most refused to convert to Islam and the majority could not speak fluent Arabic, much of the time these slaves were simply sold en masse again to newer customers and rounded up in households, boarded up in rooms while zealously guarded and followed to the toilet. This is the same story as with the grooming gangs in the West and others.
Some were seeking a slave for themselves. If they’d come to Syria from abroad their wives were often too far away to look after them. Which meant they wanted a replacement for the duration of their time away.The Girl Who Escaped ISIS, Farida Khalaf and Andrea C. Hoffman
“Your religion does not permit you to impose your faith on us,” I told them through Evin, as we were still pretending that I didn’t understand their language. “The second surah says: ‘There shall be no compulsion in the religion.’ Are we supposed to learn this by heart but ignore its meaning? What kind of ridiculous piety is that?”
The men seemed slightly rattled. Evin backed me up, citing another place in their holy book. Right at the end, in the 109th surah, it says, “For you is your religion and for me is my religion.” Pointing to the sentence, she said, “Here it is in black and white! What gives you the right to assume your religion is the only true one when your prophet says otherwise?”
“There’s something you haven’t understood,” the men said. “Here the Prophet is referring to other religions with holy scriptures; so long as they pay the head tax, Jews and Christians enjoy our protection. But you don’t. You are idolaters, devil worshippers even.”
The Girl Who Escaped ISIS, Farida Khalaf and Andrea C. Hoffman
As usual – the rules of Islam are misunderstood by those outside of it. Progressively, these women were beaten into endless routines of mock-Islamic prayer, while being abused for getting some movement or other wrong. This is no different in practice to any other kind of Inquisition by the enemy’s minions, whether Christian or communist.
Probably the most jarring aspects of these accounts is how so-called “normal” Muslims from the area bend over backwards to accommodate the Islamic State’s whims, even if they had short hair in contrast to the official look of the organization or were the locals who had been taken over. This is not exactly a great portent for any place being ransacked by Muslim migrants. This should function as a WARNING.
WIVES OF THE ISLAMIC STATE
The wives of the Islamic State also happily enjoyed their position:
She was wearing a knee-length skirt and a sleeveless T-shirt. Her hair was conspicuously bleached. That was not how I’d imagined an ISIS woman to look. She probably did the same as most Syrian women: in the occupied area they only put on the black full-length cloak when they went out into the street.
[…]
She barely spoke to Evin and me, and when she did, it was only to list the dos and don’ts. “You must never leave this room, apart from to go to the toilet,” she said coldly. “And don’t get any silly ideas; there are guards outside the building, and all our neighbors are ISIS members too. Do you understand?”
The Girl Who Escaped ISIS, Farida Khalaf and Andrea C. Hoffman
Truth be told, there are also copious accounts stories of these women, mostly the non-Syrian ones who came from the Western world, engaging in casual cruelty and general degenerate acts to the Yezidi women and children. These units of fanatical women were named the Khansa Brigade.
Many might wonder why a woman would serve the Islamic State. Firstly, the Islamic State made provisions for private female education and intensive religious education, unlike the Taliban. Technically, there is no real Islamic literature preventing women from receiving a copious religious education at home, beyond her husband or father’s desire. Secondarily, women were sometimes authorized to conduct jihad against ‘infidels’ as in Chechnya and Iraq beforehand. Islamic State manuals mandated that the workload on the wives of Islam be made lighter through the usage of slavery and other practices. All of these practices amounted to a practice of a will to power by these women. Modern amenities were also brought into the Islamic State and the men, although adulterous and debased, do not seem to have abused their wives from any account I have witnessed.
The Islamic State manuals and magazines also give a certain type of meaning and structure to a woman’s life, as debased as this is.
Although Islam’s general opinion of women is dismal, this was not a state where women of the Islamic faithful were necessarily ‘oppressed’. We can call it a different model of how sex relations work, one more suited to the desires of Muslim diaspora in the Western world. With the Yezidis, they had a ready class of dhimmis ready to exploit.
We do NOT consider these brides of IS to be ‘grooming victims of their husband’, ‘victims of racism’, ‘marginalized’, ‘pushed into IS by white supremacy’, ‘also victims like the Yezidis’ or other garbage claims held to be the truth in left-wing publications and rags across the Western world.
Many of these women were Western-educated individuals and had all the contemporary advantages, including families of business and acumen or belonging to families of Islamic troublemakers.
As for the racism claim either in contributing to ‘radicalization’, we reject this as a pathetic excuse in any case. Islam as a totalizing ideology, cult and mental illness does not belong, neither does Christianity.
Huge amounts of Westerners, past and present, have attempted to aid Arabs and protest against foreign instigation by Israel, such as the endless Palestine marches at present, but also the huge amounts of protests against the Iraq War and the assistance given to Algeria and Egypt by former German commanders.
Thousands of Bosniak, Albanian, Chechen, white American (Allison Fluhe-Ekren, named the ‘Empress of IS’), white English (such as Sally Jones or Samantha Lewthwaite) and other white women voluntarily moved to Islamic State territory. Many leftists write of individuals such as Shamima Begum not being permitted back into England due to ‘racism’: this stupid argument can easily be dismantled by showing the white jihadist dog Jack Letts was not allowed entry into England or Canada either.
If they are ‘grooming victims’, why do most of them still support their husbands? Why do they callously disregard any discussion of what has been done? Modern progressives trying to get these off the hook should indicate the deliberate and twisted thought process of pro-Islam dhimmis.
Astarte has assured me most of these women are absolutely not victims. If they were, they would not have gladly joined an organization whose acronym blasphemes Her name, the Great Mother, who is the leader of women. This is regardless of how many Israeli agents may have ‘interfered’ to bring them there. The Gods do not forget real damning acts very easily. Our command to these people is that you have been warned for your acts against Satan’s People and against Astarte.
The hostility of the Islamic State to Westerners is based on jihad and their categorization of us all, including Christian morons and the progressives who love them so much, as polytheists. You are not immune.
English