The Truth About Jihad

Jihad is translated in Arabic as ‘exertion’. What this translates to is the exertion of Islam to propagate itself whether through internal or external behaviors. It is a huge part of Islam in general: that Muslims must uphold their faith and wage war to spread Islam to the four corners of the Earth.

For example, whenever Muslims took control of a country, they gave the population a request. A person had to convert or pay hefty taxes (jizya). If one didn’t pay the tax, one was killed.

Every major Islamic text of jurisprudence (how an Islamic judge is instructed to interpret the law) defines Jihad and its desired result this way.

 

o9.0: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion.

o9.1 Jihad is a communal obligation (def: c3.2). When enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon others.

o9.8 The caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians [kafirs] (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) – which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral regions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High.

(A: though if there is no caliph (def: o25), no permission is required).

Reliance of the Traveller: The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law Umdat Al-Salik

جاء في حاشية الدسوقي: “ويتعين الجهاد بفجء العدو”، قال الدسوقي: “أي توجه الدفع بفجئ (مفاجأة) على كل أحد وإن امرأةً أو عبدًا أو صبيًا، ويخرجون ولو منعهم الولي والزوج ورب الدَّين” (حاشية الدسوقي

In Hashiyat ad Dussuqi it is stated: Jihad becomes Fard Ayn (obligatory) upon a surprise attack by the enemy. Dussuqi said: “Wherever this happens, jihad immediately becomes Fard Ayn upon everybody, even women, slaves and children, and they march out even if their guardians, husbands and creditors forbid them to.

Ibn Khaldun

جاء في نهاية المحتاج للرملي: “فإن دخلوا بلدة لنا وصار بيننا وبينهم دون مسافة القصر فيلزم أهلها الدفع حتى من لا جهاد عليهم، من فقير وولد وعبد ومدين وامرأة” (نهاية المحتاج

If they enter a town of ours and there is a short distance between us and them, then its people are obligated to repel, even those who do not have to perform jihad, whether poor, a child, a slave, a debtor, or a woman.

Nihayat al-Muhtaj,  Shihab al-Ramli

“يقول شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية: “وأما قتال الدفع فهو أشد أنواع دفع الصائل عن الحرمة والدين واجب إجماعًا، فالعدو الصائل الذي يفسد الدين والدنيا لا شيء أوجب بعد الإيمان من دفعه، فلا يشترط له شرط -كالزاد والراحلة- بل يدفع بحسب الإمكان، وقد نص على ذلك العلماء أصحابنا وغيرهم”.

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah says: “As for defensive fighting, it is the most intense form of repelling an aggressor who threatens sanctity and religion. It is unanimously obligatory. The aggressive enemy who corrupts religion and the world—there is nothing more obligatory after faith than repelling him. No conditions are required for it, such as provisions and a mount, but it is repelled to the extent possible. Our scholars and others have explicitly stated this.”

al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah

 

In contrast to all of these experts of interpreting Islamic law whose rulings are followed by Muslims, Western countries and particularly in schools, Jihad is presented as a moral or philosophical struggle for a Muslim to master their sinful tendencies. It is given a cutesy sheen to appeal to gullible and ignorant white people… with more or less an overtone of xianity.

There is a form of ‘self-exertion’ in Islam. No one can doubt that, currently, most Muslims ‘appear’ to take their religion rather seriously, at least superficially and in the way a toddler would.

In the end, this concept of ‘Jihad as raging against sin’ pales in comparison to how the word is generally used, especially in Islam’s origins.

“The notion of jihad has its origins in the Islamic idea that the whole humankind will embrace Islam.” – Wikipedia

“Most classical writings use the term “jihad” in the military sense. The tradition differentiating between the “greater and lesser jihad” is not included in any of the authoritative compilations of Hadith. In consequence, some Islamists dismiss it as not authentic.” – Wikipedia

The two quoted are of the most famous Islamic philosophers and inventors. Even they, as judges interpreting the type of law must Muslims follow, defined Jihad this way:

 

In the Muslim community, Jihad is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Islamic mission and obliging to convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force. The other religious groups did not have a universal mission and the holy war was not a religious duty for them, save only for purposes of defense. Islam is under obligation to gain power over other nations.

… We do not think that we should blacken the pages of this book with discussion of their dogmas of unbelief. In general, they are well known. All of them are unbelief. This is clearly stated in the noble Qur’an. [To] discuss or argue those things with them is not up to us. It is [for them to choose between] conversion to Islam, payment of the poll tax, or death.

Muqaddimah, Ibn Khaldun

Scholars agree that all pagans [mushrikeen] should be fought. This is founded on Quran 8:39: “Fight them until there is no Fitnah and the religion is entirely Allah’s.”

Bidayat al-Mudjtahid, Ibn Rushd

 

As HPS Maxine outlined before, “people are being indoctrinated to be slaves”.

So why are people being indoctrinated? Many academics since the 1800s have had a love affair with Islam out of hatred for their own or can see xianity is a sinking ship. Nowadays, academics are cast out of institutions even for questioning Islam.

Universities are even told to accommodate the ‘wisdom’ of Islamic preachers who give speeches about butchering non-believers, or else. In addition, many academics are communists and predictably they adore Islam as another program from the same pigsty that communism is from. They construct lies about Ibn Rushd and Ibn Khaldun as well as others of the so-called “Islamic Golden Age” being cosmopolitan and cuddly people.

It should be evident to anyone in Europe who knows immigrants and their offspring personally that very few Muslims, if ANY, practice this mythical form of ‘Jihad’ constructed by liberals, as it does NOT actually exist!

 

Where in these criminal statistics do you find any Zen-like path of ‘self evolution’? Just like axe murderers turning to Xianity and saying they are ‘saved’, the so-called internal Jihad seriously doesn’t mean ANYTHING!

In ancient civilizations, the idea of ‘xenia’ was taken very seriously and was even enshrined as a holy principle. Xenia was an obligation for someone hosting foreigners to treat them very well, but also for the foreigner to BEHAVE GRACIOUSLY AND LEGALLY AT ALL TIMES, NO EXCUSES.

Violations of this principle had extremely SEVERE penalties. Some of the most gruesome executions were meted out for violating one’s hosts.

Well, we can see this principle in accordance with the modern West is totally lost and thus the West itself is frankly at death’s door. The concept of Jihad in particular always will be in opposition to xenia.

Satanism takes self-evolution and concepts such as these very seriously.

This includes the right for societies to evolve by themselves. The Gods prize freedom of will. Satanism does not oblige itself on any nation or individual. The United States, inspired by Satanic principles as the ‘New Atlantis’, was founded on the idea of freedom of religion.

The Ancient civilizations such as Babylonia, Greece, Persia and Rome operated on the same principles. Even conquerors like Cyrus and Alexander respected religious freedoms.

In contrast…

 

وَحَدَّثَنَا أَبُو الطَّاهِرِ، وَحَرْمَلَةُ بْنُ يَحْيَى، وَأَحْمَدُ بْنُ عِيسَى، قَالَ أَحْمَدُ حَدَّثَنَا وَقَالَ الآخَرَانِ، أَخْبَرَنَا ابْنُ وَهْبٍ، قَالَ أَخْبَرَنِي يُونُسُ، عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنِي سَعِيدُ بْنُ الْمُسَيَّبِ، أَنَّ أَبَا هُرَيْرَةَ، أَخْبَرَهُ أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ ‏

‏ أُمِرْتُ أَنْ أُقَاتِلَ النَّاسَ حَتَّى يَقُولُوا لاَ إِلَهَ إِلاَّ اللَّهُ فَمَنْ قَالَ لاَ إِلَهَ إِلاَّ اللَّهُ عَصَمَ مِنِّي مَالَهُ وَنَفْسَهُ إِلاَّ بِحَقِّهِ وَحِسَابُهُ عَلَى اللَّهِ

It is reported on the authority of Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah said, “I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah, and he who professed it was guaranteed the protection of his property and life on my behalf except for the right affairs rest with Allah.”

Hadith 30, Book 1, Sahih Muslim, Muhammad Al-Bukhari

Endless Islamic butchers like Timur emerged out of nowhere, destroying endless people.

Islam, no differently from Christianity, leads to communism by DESTROYING people’s will to live and DEPRIVING people of the true God, along with CRUSHING their free will, DIVERTING it into endless resentment.

Humanity is meant to evolve. People are at different levels of development. The crime of these programs should become obvious to the thinking person past a certain point: they lock one out of any permanent good development, perpetually. No society is perfect, including the ‘pre-Islamic Arabia’, but the likes of Xianity and Islam do their best to ensure any society remains static or worse.

The pernicious program of Jihad that ‘gains power’ over souls at sword-point is a major contributor to the degeneration of humanity.

 

COMMUNISM

The Muslim countries of Bosnia, Albania, Yemen, Afghanistan and Central Asia fell into the yoke of communism with ease. Prior to communism, all of these countries were fanatically Islamic. In Bosnia and Afghanistan, prior to communism, many women wore burqas totally voluntarily, so strong was their belief.

For an overview of what happened in Afghanistan long before 9/11, look here. Afghanistan, of course, has swung back into this via full force and gone full circle.

What many people don’t know about in regards to the USSR is the genocide of Kazakhs, alongside Ukrainians and Russians. Three million Kazakhs died in terrible famines and political purges by the psychopath Stalin. Kazakhstan was turned into a hell on earth beyond imagination. Yet not many know it was previously a hotbed of ‘jihad’ and known for aggressive proselytism and Islamic slave-mongering, even into the 20th century.

Albania was so terrible to live in under the Marxist Enver Hoxha regime that it was described as ‘Europe’s North Korea’. It was a very close shave that the largest Muslim country on earth, Indonesia, did not fall to communism in the 1950s: only the intervention of the United States prevented this.

The point is, fervent belief in jewish programs superpowers the final program of communism, especially when people get tired of Islam and want to replace it with another horror-show from the gutter of the hebrew mind, but one that this time, for example, ‘respects women as equals’ like communism ‘does’. Any belief in this filthy lucre connects, destroys and swallows any civilization.

Just consult this article on Exposing Christianity, then compare it to how fervent Islamic belief is, where five times a day they pray, they fast and they follow everything externally.

The truth is that Muslims are dumping endless hideous energy on themselves and on their civilizations. In turn, the natural effects of countenancing this hideous energy can only be ‘averted’ by enslaving and abusing foreigners of merit, being parasites and violating the sacred principles of xenia.

Likewise, the enemy writes in the Protocols: “WE SHALL DESTROY GOD!”

From beginning to end, there is nothing spiritual about this cancer on mankind. Islam has nothing to improve the lives of anyone living it, beyond giving them easy access to the most baseline desires and expressing a meager, paranoid form of chimpanzee-tier emotions.

Meager as it is, this is the only reason it holds any ‘appeal’ in the west right now, as things like expressing masculinity, basics of life like marriage or the natural value of manhood have been destroyed or blocked off from the younger generations by other stupid enemy programs, such as ‘feminism’.

No ‘feminists’ have negative anything to say about Islam of course, yet those who may despise these people and look fondly on Islam often don’t question why this is.

As the program of ‘Jihad’ is subconsciously deeply hated by those it is forced on, all it creates in the end is stasis and decay. If Europeans do turn to Islam, this is a huge and bloody trap from which they will not emerge in one piece.

The end result always has and always will be the same. It is DELUSIONAL to think otherwise.

[JG] Karnonnos